You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Incentives of Steemit Part 2 - What Steemit Wants to Be vs What Steemit Is

in #steemit7 years ago

I think it is important to recognize that there are different types of social media. Take, for instance, Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube, and Twitter. Each is very different, and it is impossible to compare them on the same level. Most people are on all of these sites, but use them for different purposes. Steemit is a unique network too, and it may have a place in our daily lives among the other big social media sites, but a couple things need to happen. It needs to make adjustments to become more user-friendly, it needs famous people to join, and lastly, it needs to go viral somehow. The Steemit network still has a long way to go, only time will tell if it will ever stand along side the othersocial media giants.

Sort:  

Agree with this. There's a lot of talk, but one needs to assess what Steemit is as an entity, and what the more longer term users are providing. Sure, there are many short-term users who will cheat the system and then get bored of that, but over time Steemit should mature to be an 'ecosystem' that does what it intends: rewards those who post unique content that their followers like.
User-friendly. Yes, a little, although a learning curve also deters a lot of people. Certain areas like images etc I agree.
More exposure: yes.
Many of the other changes that are mentioned need to go back and think again about what kind of website you think Steemit is. Personally, I like the trending etc categories. But we need to try and lessen the whale war content, but if that's not possible, it might just have to be one of the downsides that balance with the upsides.