Yep @davemccoy I read the same post and it made me laugh with discomfort at the ridiculousness of this. Every which way people can be prevented from growing on here is being perpetrated. To get rid of the ants, we nuke the city. To get rid of the brownouts, we launch a freaking EMP bomb. I would rather see that reward go out into the ether, to @null than see the same power set load up while the guinea pigs keep running on the wheels trying to catch up. I have said this many times on here, steemit has such a brilliant idea on here it's not even funny. But if they don't starting making honest, good faith efforts to improve its' obvious flaws it will get passed like it's not even moving by something that will cater to the will of the user. Mark my words, it will happen much sooner than a lot of us think as well. Two or three simple rearrangements and these problems could've at least been addressed and have gone a long way to improve via some compromise by those sides on here that are being taken... But Steemit brass kissed the ring once again, or at least some part of the whales' anatomy.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You summed it up better than me Crypt... That's why I ain't buying what they're selling as the reasons... It is a complete red herring and meant to distract the people. The bottom line is they could take the money from the authors of the posts and give it the curators of the post.. that would make some sense... but no, they would get their greedy little paws on it if that happened!
Love your analogies! You capture my sentiments exactly!
Way to call it like you see it @davemccoy, being honest and out front with your opinions makes it very easy to have an intellectual conversation about the perceived good of the entire platform. How in the world did these people sign off on this, thing is I have a very hard time believing much of a number of people were involved at all. Very well stated sir!