I still think that we should work toward hardware wallet. The solution will get out of hand with the new users not understand the usual security model on blockchains.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I still think that we should work toward hardware wallet. The solution will get out of hand with the new users not understand the usual security model on blockchains.
Thats pretty much right. Nothing beats the security provided by a hardware wallet.. but do you think that everyone will be interested in buying 100$ + worth of ledger nano...
most people's accounts are not even worth that much here .. just saying though. But u r absolutely right.. i read your article and i felt absolutely gutted to see that ladger nano even supports some xyz coins but not steem.. should have been there..
Assuming a lot of people will eventually hodl more cryptocurrencies, I still think it would be worth it for enough people. Also note that you can pay ledger to work on your coin (I think it was like 50000€). Since most code are an adaptation of Bitcoin, it is not that hard. But even I was shocked by how many new coins were added.
I am sorry i couldnt upvote ur article as it was already paid out..
no worry. The fact that you read it is more than enough. It gives me motivation to work on that.
Keep steeming my friend.. i have started following you so that i dont miss out on some of your great ideas (and duly upvote those in time :) )