I'd like to respectfully disagree with the argument of this post. I don't think one should ever contend that good content doesn't deserve a reward, or if you do present such argument, what would be the limit on what is popular. For example, are you saying if an article has reach 2,000$ or more do not upvote... it's already earned enough? Would you also then suggest do not buy iphones, they already make enough? I think by creating an 'iphone' out of steemit is everyone's goal and the good content will be found through search engines. When people see the potential payouts, this will be what increases the popularity of this platform. Thus, you will then get more eyes on your posts, which I presume is what you are seeking indirectly as it sounds.
The only thing I can agree with, is a lot of people do not understand how steemit really works and especially with voting power. I think explaining that would teach them to be more cautious with their votes. This post reminds me of the news outlets of today, they under mind the public and think they have to tell us what to think.