So this is a little bit less than 1 week that we discussed about the problem with that dividend and here are the stats for this week :
Balance of casino :
15th July 2019 : ± 20.000 STEEM
20th July 2019 : ± 27.400 STEEM
NET PROFIT FOR CASINO DURING THE PERIOD ANALYSED : 7400 STEEM
Total Dividends Distributed
15th July 2019 : ± 25950 STEEM
20th July 2019 : ± 26375 STEEM
DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTED DURING THE PERIOD ANALYSED : 425 STEEM
No Withdraw or Deposit of STEEM during the period analysed.
RATIO DIVIDEND RECEIVED/ PROFIT CASINO : 425/7400 = ± 6%
If like me, you think that the calculation used for dividend by @kryptogames is unfair for all token holders, please request a dividend based on the real profit done by this casino!
Again, the opinion of TOP20 holders would be highly appreciated : @cryptoeater @lexilee @proof-of-work @broncnutz @virus707 @luckystrikes @abrockman @mentalhealthguru @khaleelkazi @trydice @bluesniper @freegon @superlotto @quuu @cryptoknight12 @zzings @holoz0r @seohyungoo @glastar @mini.supporter
PS : this analysis will be done weekly to show to everybody the reality till @kryptogames decides to put in place a REALmaximum profit distribution of 70% based on REAL profits.
@cryptopassion For once we thought that you were a fair person some 6 days ago. But after viewing your totally false analysis in this comment:
Balance of casino :
15th July 2019 : ± 20.000 STEEM
20th July 2019 : ± 27.400 STEEM
we were so wrong about you. If you could just prove the first data-point of your analysis, which is, balance of our casino on 15th July was 20,000 steem (which could be easily done by subtracting all the transactions after 15th July using any steem blockchain explorer), then only we will take this discussion forward. Otherwise, we will never entertain any analysis of yours. Now, Is that fair enough for you?
Yeah yeah you are just afraid that I disturb your profitable business...
My friend, if it is so easy to show that i was wrong, give the true number? 19500? 20500?
For sure it changes every hour but it is the true number I recorded when I did the analysis and the number displayed here will be again the number used for the next analysis... so this kind of defense won't work forever. Would be better for you to adjust your method of dividend calculation than saying that everybody is wrong...
We are not afraid of anything and especially of you.
As per our database, Balance on 15th of July (Exact time not known): 22329 STEEM. We wanted you to calculate just because you wont believe what we have anyways. Thanks for taking that screenshot of balance on 21st July. Now after 1 week, we will really come to know the exact figure. Waiting for the same.
no problem I will keep posting weekly stats with pictures like that you won't say again that I'm creating false value. Your 22329 STEEM could be at the end of the day, in the middle, at the beggining as you said yourself you don't know the exact time.
So is it really impossible that I viewed 20.000 during the day of the 15th? I can answer for you, no it is not impossible and 2k can been easly earned during one day...
By the way, to make you happy, here is the new calculation with your "official" number :
Balance of casino :
15th July 2019 : ± 22.329 STEEM
20th July 2019 : ± 27.400 STEEM
NET PROFIT FOR CASINO DURING THE PERIOD ANALYSED : 5071 STEEM
Total Dividends Distributed
15th July 2019 : ± 25950 STEEM
20th July 2019 : ± 26375 STEEM
DIVIDEND DISTRIBUTED DURING THE PERIOD ANALYSED : 425 STEEM
RATIO DIVIDEND RECEIVED/ PROFIT CASINO : 425/5071 = ± 8%
So even with your official number, your ratio dividend/profit is kinda the same... ONLY 8%... so do you think you are really able to make all that drama and say that people are not honnest while I said your ratio was 6% when it is 8% with your number ???? I'm reminding you that you are promising 70% of distribution !!!! Who is not honnest here ?
This operator is just becoming a shame also with his communication.
It's really funny that you do not understand simple English. We have just provided one data point and you have assumed all others and you call that "OFFICIAL". Even an average Joe would get that. So you can continue whatever it is you are trying to do and we do not have any more time to waste as we are busy in many other things. Good Luck.
It is so funny to see that after having provided your own data, as soon as you are seeing that you are still not fair at all in your distribution, you decide to attack other points for which you said nothing before...
No one is blind here...
Yeah continue what you are doing... lying about your real ratio profit/dividend and trying to hid as much as possible your earnings... I will just sell all these stupid tokens as they are totaly scam for token holders compare to your announce of 70% profit distribution.
In all the cases, the volume on your pseudo casino is decreasing a lot and more and more steemians are now aware about what you are calling a "Provably Fair game" and the "maximum profit distribution".
We all have been so idiot to spend STEEM on your platform... good lesson for everybody ;-)
That's a pretty bold statement there, @kryptogames - almost bordering on "verbally threatening" or at least overly POMPOUS for a business operation which is trying to present itself as professional, while also receiving some SERIOUS criticism from some Steemit members who are quite intelligent and well-respected in the community. Hmmm, and also from the way you use English and communicate might my magical power of intuition be right in guessing that you folks just MIGHT be from China, or some other country notoriously known for using some of the "tricks" some of the people here (including myself) are accusing you of??? I'd be willing to bet on that - and would probably have a better chance of actually winning...
We really can't apologise just because you think we are from China or our "English" is not so great as yours. However, there is no more sensible point left to argue with you. So now, we would prefer not to waste any more of our time as well as yours. THANK YOU.
@kryptogames - This is now an official warning to your online gambling operation that I have begun the proper process of taking legal action against your operation, beginning with notification to the Steemit administration, and then through various international law enforcement agencies and legal channels (with the help of my own legal education and those of properly practicing attorney contacts in both the United States and other international jurisdictions) to expose our operation (using screenshot evidence (of your offical posts in this profile and active gameplay, as well as confirming evidence from other players who have similar complaints against your operation). Consider this a formal warning, and expect further (legal) action within the next week.
We can again assure you legally and formally that our system is "Provably Fair". If you really think that there is some problem with the "Provably Fair" system, you should definitely take legal action. By the way, we ourselves have contacted the Steem Gamblers Association to thoroughly audit all the game algorithms and verify whether there is even 0.1% chance to manipulate the cards to clear your doubts. However, if you want to take legal recourse for that staking glitch or the dividend distribution debate (which we were anyways open to discuss with the community members as told in the previous comment), then that is a totally different thing altogether. Every platform goes through some glitch and we have not misguided or scammed a single person and even fulfilled all our promises as stated in our previous posts. Still, if you feel that we deserve to be vanquished, then you may continue.
Your balance : 26,770.611 STEEM (21th july 2019 7.31pm GMT+2)
Let's see in 1 week ;)
Be sure I will check your deposit and withdrawals
Based on your calculations - I don't exactly rescind my prior post - but can see that the site is more than sustainable at that rate of profit. Removing operating costs and a payment for the devs, I wouldn't say no tomore Steem in my wallet. Would appreciate input from others as you've raised.
I would agree that @kryptogamers stated to share 70% of the profit and then decided on a more advantageous way to calculate it through “wagers”. This is not what you claimed.
I would advise Top holders to participate and rethink the way it is calculated, because this is clearly to our disadvantage...
By doing so, you also prevent new users from joining as they feel the Staking system is rigged...
What do you all think?
Best, @vlemon
Posted using Partiko iOS