To vote for a new user is too risky and many times wasting the strength of it. So nobody has no motivation to upvote new content of a new user if he/she is not a famous person or someone from bitcoin society or photographer (photos don’t waste too much time to be seen). Nobody Won’t Read Your Content Still You’re New User, Not Famous Person, Nor From Bitcoin Society. §CATCH - 22
https://steemit.com/steemit/@denha/nobody-won-t-read-your-content-still-you-re-new-user-not-famous-person-nor-from-bitcoin-society-catch-22
The end result is you see the same authors, the same subjects, the same tags on the Trending page day after day. The system / society is closing itself this way. If the concept of Steemit is evaluation the "content" not more (the author for example), all articles, upvote and downvote have to be anonymous for some period of time.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
How about the minnows shoaling to create a whale or whales, that can be used by the shoal for the good of the shoal and in turn the whole community.
Just a thought
@saywatt To my mind, this idea has great merit! I absolutely agree. If you have a niche sub-category where you have a tribe ; I see no reason a collective co-operative voting system should not be utilized for the good of that whole community, much in the same way, for example, The Amish community will collectively help each other to build a house.
I would love to hear your ideas on expanding this thought and how it would work in real terms. Upvoted and Followed. Welcome to Steemit :)