Very few accountholders are willing to lead. Not many truly have big enough stakes to engage in meaningful development of the kind we have seen with other cryptocurrency coins that have big stakeholder whales. Ideally, witnesses should be funding this as well, but it's hard to expect that with today's low prices.
Inc owns most of the Steem and positioned itself as the dominant institution. One would think they could develop simple tokens, since they've been working on SMTs for months already. If they do, then many Steem projects would have a way to generate the economic scale they need to expand. Otherwise, there simply isn't enough Steem available for most projects to make things happen.
The witnesses have had plenty of time to put their funds to good use and the vast majority have done nothing. Now look where we are.
Hi @berniesanders , I was surprised by this statement, but I would like to know more about this. Do you have real data proof of the performance of witnesses who did nothing about it ???
Can't prove what isn't there. Your proof lies in the vacuum around the top witness's output and contributions.
Yes @sircork , I think so ... I'm just curious and curious ...
Posted using Partiko Android
Stay thirsty, my friend.
Hehehe..yes my brother...
Posted using Partiko Android
If I recall correctly, there was even a large debate about how top witnesses were not even running a full copy of the chain on their nodes recently. That speaks volumes to me.
Can you give one example @ipfaust ? I really want to see it ...
Posted using Partiko Android