You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: An open-ended question to @ned and @dan

in #steemit7 years ago

Yup. The architecture is not capable of dealing with this much data at the advertised speeds that @dan has been so specifically advertising about his 'fancy' graphene.

I hate to break it to @dan, but there is no way you can use C++ and Boost to make a fast database system. That would be C/Assembler and GLib or homegrown libraries.

Sort:  

Question:
I really think to make my old blog alive more and more, because here posts are lost if they are not viewed in 1-3 days.
Also my posts can't find them easily if i want to check them.
Can i gather information you posted here and quote them there in an article?

I would love to keep track of such good informations and that's the only good way i see. To other people can reach it also, and not be lost here.

Or better, if you can or have a full article with that, would love that more.
Waiting for your answer. Tks

C++ can be quite fast but of course Assembler and C are slightly faster. Enough to make a difference though? I'm not certain.