Just to clarify that I also further clarified after my quoted post, that the application constitutes an expression of speech, and the omission of explicit consent, is fraud. Lies by omission. No matter how well intentioned, and as I have been informed, this arrangement is to my detriment as my accounts are too big to qualify for the reward posts.
So I stand by what I said, and I laugh at the flag that was pinned to it, especially after I already qualified this.
Beneficiaries are a great idea, and I see many potential applications for them. However, I will drop a meme in here to express my frustration with Steemit, Inc., whose 'omissions' and lack of followthrough on everything (this means you @ned after your skype chat with me 13 months ago, and still no action on the subject of that conversation):
I've upvoted this comment.
According to downvote rules that pop up:
Hate speech or internet trolling
So the downvote flag appeared to have been appropriate in that particular instance on your @elfspice comment which threatened @good-karma
I want to thank you for your comment this time around.. as you can see you can still make your viewpoint heard without attracting downvotes.
As far as your chat with @ned, I can't comment on it. Perhaps you might try again, I don't know. Either way, that's a completely different topic than the subject matter of this post we're talking about.
Either way, I think the HF18 beneficiary feature is now well explained, and I thank you for your attempt to bring light to the issue (even if I disagreed with your original method).
Alas, here's where I move on and let my opinions on the issue rest.
(I really don't want to talk about this anymore. If you like I leave the last word to you.)
heya. beneficiaries are implemented......!
@ned,,, nice to meet you
please follow back, and often come in my blog :D