I thought about this a bit more. FOSSBot is quite a good tool really. A Curation team could use FOSSBot to mark posts that fit broad criteria with a dust-sized upvote. Then, they could track the upvotes to decide what to curate. That'd make for a much easier curation workflow build on best of breed existing tools.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Interesting idea! Dust vote tagging is one way if you want to keep it totally on chain, better than an annoying comment for sure. I think this idea could feed into the curation SMT idea in my more lengthy comment above 😊 What do you think?
The dust vote tagging was more a way to separate concerns between a coarse parameter driven bot and something that took the output from that to a human. It doesn't have to be on chain but, 1) FOSSBot already does the coarse parameter search well and can leave dust votes on the chain. 2) A human curator is going to have to interact with the chain anyways so why introduce a second layer of comms - unless we're worried about chainbloat.
I wouldn't be worried about chainbloat for a project like that no. Makes sense, good idea.
Would you like to co-propose this on Utopian.io ?
I only like to formally propose when I'm willing to put the work into implementation. Right now, my priorities are elsewhere. If you're thinking about making better curation tools - then please do go ahead!
For me, I'm not going to do another project for Steemit or related where I am the sole major contributor so I'll wait for the right time instead. I'm going to keep talking about these ideas so we'll see what comes up between all the people and all the ideas 🙂