I know it has been discussed before but I still think that we need to determine when flagging a post is acceptable. Should it be solely for plagiarism/spam or should it be what one person subjectively decides is good for the masses? Without first defining what constitutes abusing "the power of negative voting" as you put it, it is difficult to tweak the system appropriately.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Agreed. We need some clarification on this. I still think positive voting should be used for expressing likes (and not voting for dislikes) with flagging reserved for abuse of the platform.
It is going to be subjective and community consensus, always. There is no way to define "solely for plagiarism/spam" (or any other such definition) in a protocol. The protocol can provide the tools, but people still have to decide how to use them.
I know but we need to reach some kind of consensus on what it should be for - people consensus rather than blockchain consensus lol.