“Based on our ratings model, which considers each coin’s investor risk and reward plus technology and adoption fundamentals, coins with a Weiss Cryptocurrency Rating of D- or lower include the following 12:
On the Weiss Ratings scale (from A to E), D is described as “weak,” and E is “very weak.” The plus and minus signs indicate the upper and lower third of each grade range, respectively.”
Gottcha, so they're looking at the projects as a whole. The fundamentals are bad for these projects is what I gather. Bad teams or poor ideas. Cool, that helps me out some. Thanks!
I'm confused? Do you know their eating criteria?
“Based on our ratings model, which considers each coin’s investor risk and reward plus technology and adoption fundamentals, coins with a Weiss Cryptocurrency Rating of D- or lower include the following 12:
Auraracoin (D-), Comet (E-), Electroneum (E+), Expanse (E), Gulden (D-), Matchpool (E), Magacoin (E-), Novacoin (E), PotCoin (D-), Quark (E-), Rise (D-) and SaluS (E-).
On the Weiss Ratings scale (from A to E), D is described as “weak,” and E is “very weak.” The plus and minus signs indicate the upper and lower third of each grade range, respectively.”
Gottcha, so they're looking at the projects as a whole. The fundamentals are bad for these projects is what I gather. Bad teams or poor ideas. Cool, that helps me out some. Thanks!