I appreciate you understanding my questions. I do think the platform is interesting and def has huge potential. I also understand things seem to be okay, but that also means, possibly, that they could be tweaked to be even better, allowing for even more quality of content. I do like the positivity on steemit, that is unique!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I actually really agree with you on this. I think the strongest systems are the ones that have the best real world testing and can then adapt and use all the lessons learned to make it better.
I've been really interested in how you could use Steemit to create an infrastructure for film-makers to be able to self fund and self distribute their films without having to go to Distributors. So I have a really specific angle of what I'd like to see it be able to do. It doesn't currently quite fit the needs of film-makers but there are already some film-makers trying to use it in different ways to suit their needs ( check out @steemfilm ) and it doesn't take long after that if enough people use the system in different ways for the developers hopefully to see the need to then build the features in.
If you are interested I wrote a really detailed article on what I'd like to see happen for film makers which is about Steemit becoming a new type of distribution platform where the production of the film itself becomes the distribution model so that the Distributor (think large Hollywood studios with vested interests) are taken out of the equation. It's too detailed to explain here but if you want to take a look at the article I want people to pull the idea apart and tell me what they see is wrong with it.
https://steemit.com/film/@angusg/a-new-way-to-fund-feature-films-based-on-the-steemit-blockchain