@simundnash, what you are doing here is irresponsible, offensive, and (despite your good intentions) not in the best interest of steemit. I'll explain why.
First, you can claim you're not accusing anyone, but you're basically saying "hey, people are abusing the system and I've developed a means to find them. These are suspects according to my system." Sure, you admit the algorithm is still a work in progress, but now you have put people (who have nothing to do with voter rings) on the defensive. For some new users, this is the first time they are being mentioned in a post (a big moment) and to them, they are listed as a suspect (in their own mind). These people are not going to want to invest in a community that seems to accuse people based on an unpolished system.
Second, it's offensive to those of us who work our butts off for the upvotes we earn. We aren't just posting and relying on voter rings to generate money for us; we work hard for those funds. Sure, some people abuse the system, but by and large, people on steemit make their own success.
You're also trying to crack down on a behavior that is not, as far as I can tell, against the rules. So you are alienating people for something thatreally isn't the huge problem you make it out to be. Voter rings are not harming steemit overall. While it would be nice to see a system free from voter rings, why would you alienate steemit users to achieve that goal???
Feel free to continue perfecting your algorithm, but be gentle with how you mention others. You've done no one any favors including yourself.
Lastly, publishing this post was irresponsible. You mentioned this system was incomplete...but you still felt the need to list all the steemians who could be potential suspects (call it what you want, you accused them). Why would you publish something with so little factual evidence? If you wanted to develop such a system with the help of others, you could have easily done so with a post that didn't name names. The fact that you chose to include names made this feel like much more of a personal attack (which I can only assume was not the intention).