Your argument is logically flawed: if you were that baby, you would not be able to make this judgment.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Your argument is logically flawed: if you were that baby, you would not be able to make this judgment.
Well, it is the same thing as if someone missed a flight that crashed, and later they say, exactly "Hey, I'm glad I did not get on that plane"
Would you answer
Your argument is logically flawed: if you were on that plane, you would not be able to make this judgment.
?
Well, would you?
Being a conscious human being while a plane is crashing is a very different situation from being an unconscious human embryo.
And another thing: maybe dying in a plane crash is the best thing that can happen to you. You never know until this happens. Maybe consciously experiencing the last few seconds of your life is the best experience you can have on this planet. So when you say "I'm glad I did not get on that plane", you are actually wrong.
All we know is that an unwanted child can ruin a mother's life (which will emotionally harm the child as well). We know nothing about the consciousness of the child being aborted. So it's known vs. unknown. In this case I choose what's known.
My question, exactly, was, would you say that to that person. Still holds, you haven't answered.
> We know is an unwanted..
Who is we?
What is known? That you would be conscious when you die on a plane?
What the fuck are you talking about?
I don't know if you have a conscience. for that matter
Is it alright if I kill you?
First you say the human embryo is unconscious and then you say you have no evidence if it has a conscience? (Since you cannot say the baby is not alive you call it unconscious human embryo)