Life is we live and we all live different lives. That's the way things have always been. Don't rock the boat. These are things we hear or say regular when we have a situation we do not know how to change or do not want to take the risk of changing them ourselves?
Being relatively new to the platform, my opinions may be of a novice nature. The things I mention may have been talked about in previous posts and anything I say a repeat of what has been said.
The first thing I see is Steemit needs to have the ability to adapt. After an adaption of any platform upgrade or adjustment, allocated time shold be in place shuold any change have a negative impact. Gettings things right first time is not te best expectation to have. There have been changes in the past to the nyber of posts per 24 hr can be made. So the platform is regulated in some manner.
The second thing I notice is the lack of community in a general sense, personal gain winning out once again over the success of all. Human nature or human programming of mindset. I recognoise not all users of the platform are specifically out to futher themselves with no regard for another. There is much valued content outthere.
There are solutions to any issue situation or problem which people face. With all solutions though, they come with a cost. Who or how will this cost be negated or covered? Someone will lose out here more then others, they will oppose this change.
After an issue is identified and a solution is browsed upon, when a possible solution can be found. Who decides and how is a big decision like so came upon, Voting or a commitee of some kind?
If the vote on this matter was done in the same manner as rewards, If they where the bigest whale within a pod of whales. The vote is decided before any vote is cast. Should the wieght of vote in this circumstance be equal to all or reliant on Steem Power?