Yep, It looks very much like the ratio of votes is screwed by bots. curators are likely not being rewarded for their content least not on the level they could in the absense of bots.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yep, It looks very much like the ratio of votes is screwed by bots. curators are likely not being rewarded for their content least not on the level they could in the absense of bots.
I 100% agree, but I do not see the bots going away anytime soon, but hopefully as more real people join... they will be able to drowned out the bots.
I think so, the incentive system, rewards for curation and participation also called the attention ecconony by other platform developers is interest. Was listening to a talk by Sam Kazemian, CEO of everipedia earlier, think he described it as being as complex as designing blockchain delegation and voting, something along those lines anyway.