IN MY OPINIONS THESE ARE THE NEGATIVES AND POSITIVES OF STEEMIT AND I WANT YOU TO WRITE YOUR ON OPINIONS IN THE COMMENTS Positives:
- This is so new and novel that few if any people actually understand its potential
- it has the ability of upvoting people and giving people rewards is really amazing
- steemit gives you that opportunity to earn and if you work hard it can make you a living
- people who wants to be at home and work steemit is the greatest platform for them
- On the blockchain, private and not corporate owned!
- Opportunities to make new friend and new followers and can contact with many people and can ask for their ideas
- Some amazing kind, caring souls here and
- on steemit you can get to know that you can get famous here and you can earn alot of money
- but in my opinion steemit is far more better then anyother platform
Negatives
- There is a pretty big about of spam and sometimes its really hard to find good posts to read on steemit
- Too many bots. Posts older than 7 days can't earn rewards.I've voted for older posts, so was that a waste of vote?
- Hard to connect to people when Introduction posts disappear down the feed.and you cannot text anyone on steemit directly for that you have to send money to talk
- many people are misusing the tags where you cannot find the correct stuff on steemit with some of the tags
- Curation does not work correctly, centralization of voting rewards.
To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:
Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.
I fully agree with you in positive points and negative points.
When I started and till now I read many posts that says be genuine, original and you will earn followers and bucks both but after ten months in this platform what I have felt is that it is not true. Generally what brings you follower and bucks is vote for vote and how much SP you have.
If you want good content and you see content older than 7 days how would you consider it a wasted vote to upvote good content? Neither you or the author get steem, true, but upvoting good content has an intrinsic value. It helps to show the content is good and helps to reinforce the author's reputation. If upvotes on old posts no longer mattered than why would steemit still allow upvoting to be done?