I agree , anything wrong is wrong I feel like we could create a system where if people think something is wrong they downvote it but not really being the value of the post down but if it revolves around plagiarism then it should decrease the payout
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not sure you understood what I was saying.
Maybe focusing on the payout so wrong it’s not suppose to be that way , to me engagement is key and feedback then comes the payout . You can expect to receive $100 everyday that leads to greed and greed leads to bad behavior and jealousy
Ideally, the potential payout would be hidden until after payout, but it'd be possible to dig up the info anyway, so it wouldn't work. But ideally.
We could add an off-chain secret voting layer. The difficulty would be doing it in a way that's decentralized while remaining secret, and encouraging people to use it. A simplistic approach would be a vote collating service which is given the authority to vote by users but they only apply them on a Just-In-Time basis.
Hi...
I voted,Commend for you, please comment, vot on my post @rjrubel.........
I was expecting an awesome account with loads of SP, fighting off spam, as you have a gif animation and all.
But then you had like less than 500 SP.
But way to go buddy. Keep on fighting evil, that's your way to make the world a better place.
Maybe it's spam)) Also it's funny a little
This is spam. I suggest rethinking your approach to posting here.
nice post
@miti downvote
Hi...
I voted,Commend for you, please comment, vot on my post @rjrubel
@miti downvote
???
come on miti :D
Hi...
I voted,Commend for you, please comment, vot on my post @rjrubel
@miti downvote