You pretended to be me, used a photo of me and a similar username, and said you were me, all the while calling my friends "ugly bitches."
I'm not even mad. Just fucking be honest and admit it and it will be over.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You never used Steemit chat??? What's this, then? You said you did, right here:
The sooner you stop lying, the better it will be for you.
You know who. I have the screenshot of you telling me you know, but won't tell.
And I have the screenshot of you verifying it is the REAL YOU from the same conversation:
You are stuck, man. Just tell the truth and I will stop.
I'm confused why you keep using a screenshot from chat which could just be another impersonated account, just like someone impersonated you? Is that really evidence? If someone created a chat account using my publicly available profile image and said "Yes, I'm @lukestokes" would that be evidence?
What if you're being doubly trolled? It may be possible this Steemit user is innocent and "admitting" whatever just to make the flags stop (clearly their English isn't the best). I've read your other post about the textual similarities, and it's certainly possible it is the same person. It's also possible it's an amazingly intricate troll, even down to replicating someone's writing style to trick someone else into flagging them.
@lukestokes, please read my blog. He has already directly admitted this. And if you understood the screenshots presented correctly you would understand that it is no longer speculation whatsoever.
I've had enough for today. This guy has also directly threatened me in my personal life. Read up before commenting, please man.
"He" admitted it on the blockchain or you're assuming the person you talked to in chat is the same person on the blockchain because... they said so? So... you're trusting the liar as your evidence?
You may very well be right, I just don't see hard evidence other than a screenshot from chat which you yourself know firsthand can be easily manipulated to pretend to be someone else.
Your confirmation bias for people having crippling confirmation biases is becoming tiresome.
Here's a connection to the blockchain, this I see as evidence connecting the chat personality directly with the blockchain personality because the person in chat said they would do this:
The actions of the person in the chat correspond with the actions on the blockchain. That, to me, is close to solid evidence connecting the two identities. That's all I was looking for, but this only happened 9 minutes ago.
I'm sorry it's tiring, but I just wanted clarification on the evidence.
Someone has then a very cunning plan to ruin bilalhaiders account, as there was a flagging wave from chat users after bilalhaider (or someone pretending to be him) was very disrespectful to women using chat, leaving woman hating comments and using their pictures to make insulting images.
Then he came back later, after being flagged, spamming the chat "You ruined my account so I'll ruin your chat"-message, along many other messages.
This was a cunning plan in total, though, as the chat user "bilalhaider" was chatting at least 2-4 days before starting to insult women based on the conversations (in which he was being cocky asshole, insulting users when not appreciating his amount of followers he had gained by his bot, which he was bragging about).
He even shared some photos which he hasn't used on Steemit, so he must have got them from Facebook or some other site.
A very cunning plan.. or bilalhaider being an ass and trying to avoid the blame.
I think at this point it's clear they are the same, troubled person. This comment includes some blockchain evidence connecting to the actions of the person in chat. Sadly, this person seems to be quite unstable. I hope they get some help or at least find a different hobby than tormenting others.