Right, that's why I addressed that the lack of transparency is only a part of the problem. Even if someone is being transparent about vote-buying, that doesn't change the fact that the act itself is completely opposed to Dan's visions for the platform, and terrible for the economy. At this point, the majority of the rewards pool is being distributed by these 4-5 whales (mostly @ freedom) purely based on who pays them, eliminating any quality, discouraging anyone from joining the platform, and widening the already disgusting gap in stake distribution.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: