Ok, you are making a lot of claims, with no proof. I read the bullshit article. It has no link, no webpage. The words on the image are not from the new Zealand government.
That text is not a study. There is no reliable link to an interpretation of that graph,it's just a graph. You call me a fool?
You are the one making unfounded claims. You are a liar, manipulator, misogynist, a fool, and a piece of shit.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Aren't we getting feisty as the lies you've built your ego and self-worth around come crumbling down?
You're just denying the citations over and over again. Reality denial is a poor source of debate.
Here is the conclusion from the study: " whilst working age men contribute significantly more taxation and receive less income support than their female counterparts"
Here is the citation:
Omar Aziz
Government of New Zealand - Treasury
Norman Gemmell
Victoria University of Wellington - Victoria Business School
The Distribution of Income and Fiscal Incidence by Age and Gender: Some Evidence from New Zealand
You'll notice figures 5 and 6 on page 14, that prove that I am 100% correct, and that you are merely a cognitively dissonant mudslinger.
If you manage to accept this information without sputtering another sequence of 5 unfounded ad-hominems in a row, I know what you will do next. You will simply attack the study as being simply one country, one data point, etc. You would hypothetically have a point, so let's take care of that next.