Possibly. I am only doing 1 or 2 per day so far.... hehe...
What about the reverse? To give more potential rewards incentive to those who are just starting so that they can climb? Instead of providing more reward possibility to those who are already established, have followers, and probably make a decent amount of Payout Potential each time they post? It's not equitable to give those who have more popularity, even more posting quantities, as that simply maximizes more upvote potential payouts for them, while the little fishes have to work even harder for exposure to get recognized. This is why I think it should maybe be the reverse.
I would also like to have a quality control mechanism if people keep posting over and over but it's essentially garbage, that at some point, they either stop or they get penalized. I don't appreciate much how there is only a "new" feeder for everyone to go to and there is so much "trash" low quality posting going on IMO, that it clouds the feed from higher quality content accessibility. I checked one person this morning, and they had over 1000 posts, and the titles were non interesting quality information, yet they keep posting that low quality garbage.
I am looking to make steemit into a high quality information source of meaningful posts that target the state of our world and the means to change it for the better. That's my goal in getting SP and curating!
Thoughts?
Thanks! Take care. Peace.
EDIT.
No offense, but I look at your posts, and I only see 1/2 or less that is meaningful. I don't want you to add more of that low quality to this platform. No thanks on your proposal. I see why you want it though LMAO.
I think this might be the better idea, although both viewpoints have their merits. Maybe another option would be to do the reverse option, but allow people to pay like 1SBD to make an extra post without affecting post rewards, and that money goes back to rewarding newer posts.
Good idea we need posting power as well as voting power.
... meaningful to YOU.
I realize you say 'no offense', but what do you expect when you tell someone you want them to post less based on your personal, subjective analysis?
As far as your points, there is garbage that comes in and garbage that goes out. But the most important point is that one mans garbage is another mans gold. You would do well to recognize this point.
This is not YOUR platform. This is an ecosystem. Mute buttons exist for a reason, as does reputation and rewards.
I don't want to mute you. I just want the quality to go up. Duh it's not my platform. I can and will vote where I see greater higher quality content though.
Maybe you should reevaluate what you do post, and focus on higher quality content, then you would still have room to post each day, rather than post lower quality content, run out of posts-per-day, and make a thread like this because you reached your limit each day posting that stuff. Up the game, put higher quality out. It takes more effort and time to do so. Stop looking at it as a money game. Peace.
I'm testing the market to find out where I can be of service and where my voice is deemed valuable. I haven't found out where 'my wheelhouse' is yet.
Everyone thinking long term is already doing that. I'm just looking to fail fast and learn faster.
Basically, until you find a sugar daddy whale, you keep plodding along. Just look at @jacor -- he can't post anything without earning at last ~$300 and kudos to him and whoever consistently upvotes him!
His work is now 'subsidized' for a lack of better terms, so he can focus on the type of posts that earned that 'subsidy'. If he branches out and upvotes go away, he learns.
I'm not looking at this as a "money game" and part of my frustration with your comment is your assertion to 'know' my motives and intentions. I want to make a living writing. I've been paid before Steemit and could be paid after if it provided enough for my family.
This isn't a money game to me. This is an opportunity to earn a living and I'm searching for what will make that possible