That's exactly what I remember reading now. There is certainly lots of potential for abuse at the end of windows. I don't know how much separation into two windows for abuse changes anything.
I don't know why people don't listen to reason either. I remember reading your words. Steem is complicated for a reason; operating far from equilibrium is much more fun for some people.
I think there are plenty who care. They will be the ones to jump ship when another service implements a "better" economic model.
Who knows. Always have my support.
Well, if the people writing the code don't care or ignore the valid criticisms - as they often do - then one obvious way to get their attention may just be to exploit the poorly written and implemented code. If they continue to see the problem and don't bother to address it, then perhaps we know their position on the matter.
In any case - as long as the exploits exist, you can expect them to be used and abused. Not that this is necessarily "abuse," but there are certainly some rather easy fixes.
Right you are. That exploitation becomes more complex when the system is not operating optimally. Maybe it is easier. I don't know. We can only find out by trying. I'm not much of a coder but...