"Those caps will have negative repercussions. What if someone spends weeks or months developing a sidechain application for Steemit and then releases... only to receive 5k when they've actually added a huge amount more value to the platform. It disincentives things like this which will drive demand and growth in the future.
Capping voting power at a fixed rate disincentives holding Steem Power, resulting in more powering down and fragility in the system.
So I think the best way would be to cap curation rewards as a % relative to Steem Power. I'm not sure what it would be but as a reference wang is at around a 100% simple interest increase per year."
Once that cap is reached then the larger SP holders have the incentive to instead focus their efforts on market cap appreciation. Which means mass adoption, diversity and a sustained form of growth."
The best is if you would exactly explain it your next post, giving good examples from real life equality solutions in unequal socio-economical systems
About those negative repercussions, I posted edit in my post here:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@logic/steemit-equality-solution-introducing-steem-power-limit-to-maxiumum-of-5000-and-daily-earnings-cap-to-5000sd