Seriously. Why is that, when confronted with a simple challenge to produce direct evidence, people promoting chemtrails go silent? I'm just saying it's too easy to point a camera at some contrails and say "chemtrails" and expect everyone to believe you. Where's the evidence? It shouldn't be too hard for LOTS of people to verify this theory independently. If jet fuel is being infused with some metal or chemical, it should be showing up all over the place, and should be readily detectable/measurable using basic chemistry. Why isn't that happening?
I like that you're bringing it up here. I'm not against you. I'm just happily engaging in open discussion and debate: something that has become almost impossible in this very polarized society. I'm open to hearing your ideas.
No. I think something similar has probably been tested and will be applied for geoengineering purposes. However, I also believe that contrails initiate cloud formation. This phenomenon has been scientifically and statistically proven (to my satisfaction, anyway). I'm a sceptic when people look up at these formations and say "contrail!" I'm challenging them to step up en masse. It's not enough for one alarmist to make a big hoopla about the issue. Airport fuel tanks are easy to sample on the ground. People like to talk and leak about these types of issues. Look at the #metoo movement. A widespread problem, with a bulk of people having negative first-hand experiences. Even though it hasn't been highlighted in the media, I've heard many first and second hand accounts from many women (and some men) for years. That validation is missing from the contrails discussion. The people who are leading the chemtrails discussion seem to thrive on (and maybe profit from) the publicity and controversy they generate. It feels ego-driven, not issues-driven. That's the problem I see.
@Chemtrails should be pretty easy to sample and test. Has anyone tried that?
Seriously. Why is that, when confronted with a simple challenge to produce direct evidence, people promoting chemtrails go silent? I'm just saying it's too easy to point a camera at some contrails and say "chemtrails" and expect everyone to believe you. Where's the evidence? It shouldn't be too hard for LOTS of people to verify this theory independently. If jet fuel is being infused with some metal or chemical, it should be showing up all over the place, and should be readily detectable/measurable using basic chemistry. Why isn't that happening?
Conduct your own due diligence. G. Ed Griffith is a good place to start. Educate yourself and prove us wrong. It appears you have made up your mind.
I like that you're bringing it up here. I'm not against you. I'm just happily engaging in open discussion and debate: something that has become almost impossible in this very polarized society. I'm open to hearing your ideas.
https://steemit.com/hypnosis/@micahbooh/the-power-of-awareness-what-thirty-years-of-hypnotic-trance-reveals
If you haven’t already; take a look at my previously posted material on social engineering
Very good. Just read the one you linked to.
https://steemit.com/psychology/@micahbooh/how-to-awaken-yourself-from-a-hypnotic-state-it-s-really-simple-the-most-controversial-posting-i-have-contributed
No. I think something similar has probably been tested and will be applied for geoengineering purposes. However, I also believe that contrails initiate cloud formation. This phenomenon has been scientifically and statistically proven (to my satisfaction, anyway). I'm a sceptic when people look up at these formations and say "contrail!" I'm challenging them to step up en masse. It's not enough for one alarmist to make a big hoopla about the issue. Airport fuel tanks are easy to sample on the ground. People like to talk and leak about these types of issues. Look at the #metoo movement. A widespread problem, with a bulk of people having negative first-hand experiences. Even though it hasn't been highlighted in the media, I've heard many first and second hand accounts from many women (and some men) for years. That validation is missing from the contrails discussion. The people who are leading the chemtrails discussion seem to thrive on (and maybe profit from) the publicity and controversy they generate. It feels ego-driven, not issues-driven. That's the problem I see.
We live in a very contrived world. Social engineering is rampant and divide and conquer as well.
I agree with you 100% on that!