@dwinblood I couldn't have said it better. I'm not a follower either and I'm more than willing to take an unpopular stance, maybe too much so, sometimes, but I'm not a hater and I like all sorts of content. I appreciate the high and low culture. I go to the symphony and the dirt track, but the circle jerk upvote abuse is obviously a real problem as I see it. Maybe I was a little rash and to quick to pull the trigger on calling for downvotes, so be it. But I see it as the only answer to what to me is just another form of cronyism at work here, a small club abusing their power and influence. Steemit has been likened to a new kind of economic system and with that in mind it is susceptible to corruption and abuse and right now it's an insider game here and the rest follow along. I see it as a huge problem and not just out of self interest, but like I said, because I believe the potential here is so much greater .
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If you've seen reddit then you've likely see that down voting can be just as bad. In fact it can be worse. If you get people starting to down vote anything they don't agree with or dislike, or that they are angry because someone else voted for that person's post then where does it stop?
In addition, you are not hurting the person that voted for that post at all. You are hurting the person that received the vote. This is no solution. You'll get blowback and it'll just spin out of control and people retaliating against perceived injustice.
When in reality there are some simple questions:
When someone else receives a vote, how does that hurt you or me? It's not like I had taxes taken against my will, I didn't pay anything. It actually has ZERO impact on you and I other than making the trending page pretty useless. Since you don't get curator rewards for stuff on the trending page it is better to hang out in NEW and HOT anyway.
No anyone receiving a vote truly hurts no one. They are not taking from you and redistributing it to someone else. That doesn't exist here.
In the world of taxation and taking your money without your consent and then redistributing it to people you'd be spot on. That isn't possible in this environment.
In fact even any perceived cronyism is NO big deal as it has ZERO impact on you or I. (again unlike taxation and regular money)
It does however have the potential of gradually elevating people who might like some of the stuff you and I post and their vote will suddenly be worth more than the $0.01 my vote is currently worth. As you and I gain power our vote will be worth more and I'll only be voting for things I like. If you do as well, and so do other people then it will work out. It is just WAY WAY early in the life of this and it hasn't had a chance to spread out yet. That doesn't mean it doesn't have problems. I just don't see ANY cases where down voting will be a solution with the exception of addressing spam, plagiarism, and abusive/offensive posts with no warning.
No reason to attack people's post because someone else voted for them.