You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A Questionnaire For Whales And Solutions For FRUSTRATED MINNOWS: Comments Are Needed, Don't Have To Upvote

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

Possible without a whale to do to make bots whales which will track relevant,quality content and vote then the allocation will be fair and live whales are not for each other to vote and earn the coins rate will be increased.
Whales are real people and that's the problem,everyone can make mistakes,to pursue their goals. And this affects 90% of the community members.

Sort:  

I understand your point, and I'm not being critical of your opinion as much as I'm trying to state the facts. Automated bots, realitsically, cannot live up to the expectation of choosing what's valuable and what's not - not on a platform like steemit. Bots are emotionless, have no insight, and only have an ability to compare data. They cannot reason, and therefore it's unreasonable to expect the system to manage itself in that fashion.

Again, I'm not trying to be negative or overly critical, but I think you're missing the point on what makes steemit so uniqe. If your only goal is to create revenue on steemit, you either need to invest or begin pumping out quality content. Again, there is work involved. The platform isn't here to create handouts. If you have good content and are persistent, your efforts will pay off.

People whales, sensory,materialistic, vote only for their benefit(for each other Earning SP).Are not experts in characteristic content of the assessment content.
Bots would analyze the content according to the algorithm without emotion. You say quality posts? If simple people will write high quality article and the same article will be written by Whales, who do you think earns more?