That's a good suggestion. A good first step. However, you could still have people conclave voting and gaming the system and colusion. In fact, its already been many cases of that where people work together still conspiring to take money from the rewards pool.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
that will always be the case in a system like this. one could argue that musing.io is such a group. we are human after all. its natural that we band together in groups with others we feel comfortable around. the whole safety in numbers herd mentality. in such groups there will be voting on other members post. in fact there should be more votes given by those within the group to other members that votes from those that are outside of the group. this would be due to the fact that those within the group are more attentive to each other than to those who are outsiders. its like a group/troop of monkeys sharing fruit and picking the lice off each other.
shit i hope you understand what i'm trying to say. i have a bad habit of getting long winded and rambling on and on...
good reply. i think another thing that could or should bed one away with is the whole vote buying sca.....system(yeah lets call it a system). i know that that is a very polarizing topic. ether for it or against it. to me buying votes is just corrupting the trending list as well as draining the reward pool. i do however acknowledge that vote buying can be helpful for minnows. however the system can also lead to people half assing their post. yeah i know that is funny coming from me who has been called a shit poster.