Thank you, you've probably saved me some heartache and wasted time. Not spamming is obvious, but the use of upvotes is good to know. From a writers perspective I'm sure they want more upvotes, but from a new user's perspective, if their votes are somewhat wasted, then a balance obviously needs to be found. Good to see you include the value of reading, especially if it leads to intelligent commenting. I guess we all want to see Steemit reach it's true value, especially in terms of content.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What would you define as "if their votes are somewhat wasted"???
How is your vote wasted? Just because you might not get Dollars or immediate reward for it? There's absolutely no harm in upvoting stuff but in not upvoting, you start introducing a culture where writers get even more demotivated and no one upvotes any of your own stuff anymore too, because it's "wasted" anyway.
Great idea...
@oululahti I guess I should have been more specific, and stated to not run amok up voting anything and everything that gets posted, because that is what I see a lot of the new comers doing. And that probably just loads the blockchain, and doesn't pay anyone or if it does very little. But what I didn't state was the "inspirational reward" created by up votes for the Writer. I will address that in another post I promise @oululahit ok?
Based on what I read from the article, I would see "if their votes are somewhat wasted" to mean upvoting everything, because that's what you thought was required, without commenting, or contributing in some degree. Some of what I see going on is some users upvoting everything. If I understand this article correctly then eventually they have no more Steem Power left, and their votes become worthless. This is what I meant meant by that comment. It's not an all or nothing thing, but using your upvotes to reward truly good content (as you see it) becomes an extremely valuable thing to do. Who wouldn't want to reward good content?
Yes, but your Voting Power (that regenerates anyway over a few days) is basically only relevant if your vote is backed by enough Steem Power to actually make a difference financial wise. Else we're discussing your vote is either worth 0.001$ or 0.00001$. Who cares about that reward anyway?
In that stage, it's the upvote itself that's important, not the ridiculously small financial reward.
I'm not sure that I mentioned financial reward. My only point, based on my understanding of this article, was in the overuse of the upvote for no tangible benefit. If that's not the case then so be it. I'm new to Steemit, so please don't assume that I know more than what I can learn from others willing to teach. Such as this article, and others chiming in with corrections.
@naquoya Please see my replies to @charlchristo and @freewill Thank you.