Although I may be late to this great discussion which I think creates constructive thoughts on the process going forward, I come back to @steemitblog post:
Ensuring that low SP users can transact as much as possible is our #1 priority and we will continue to work with the witnesses to optimize the system to that end.
Now, because the rate of of subsidized account creation is determined by the witnesses, Steem can admit as many people into our community as we desire, as long as the witnesses agree that it is safe to do so.
Thanks to the flexibility of this system, we can continue to optimize it in ways that ensure small stakeholders can take full advantage of this revolutionary platform while limiting the risks associated with spam.
We are committed to ensuring that this is not a path we alone determine. We will continue engaging in discussions with witnesses, community members, and any reasonable voice acting in good faith for the benefit of the Steem blockchain. We encourage you all to make your views and opinions known to the witnesses, and to reinforce those views with your witness votes.
The intention is NOT to limit engagement for new users nor smaller accounts. Given the flexibility of the new system, witnesses through the feedback from the community (like this post and its comments) can look to adjust to seek balance in this new Steem “economy.” I look forward to seeing how we can use these discussions to set the tone for adjustments to get the balance to ensure adequate engagement is possible, whatever the metrics needed are which I think is still up for debate at this point based on what I have read here.
Awesome.. You may be late, but you're message is definitely welcome! Thank you so much for pointing that out and reminding everyone what the goals are. Now lets find a way to hit 'em!