Sort:  

True. I think you have to take into account the amount of interaction created to vote in the witnesses to create a stalemate. Thus nothing.

There is definitely not a single point of escalation in this. There are multiple and ignoring some points doesn't make the other points more severe. While 22.2 could be considered an escalation, it had a public stated goal and rationale of being temporary. There could have been some communication from Justin's side, but there wasn't.

  • That failure to communicate was a point of escalation.
  • The deceiving of exchanges to power up was an escalation.
  • The takeover was an escalation.
  • HF 22.5 was a de-escalation (with the caveat that it was done under a central authority).
  • Calling the fork the work of hackers was escalation
  • Demanding a change in powerdown time is escalation

This is all from after 22.2. There were other escalations beforehand including:

  • failure to answer requests for communications
  • Announcement that Steem will move to Tron
  • The use of Genesis coins for Tron super Rep voting

All of those factor into the current situation.

While 22.2 could be considered an escalation...

It broke the trust of the Chain by individuals restricting account options on specific accounts, as opposed to a universal change, like no powering down for anyone.

It was an escalation by witnesses taking arbitrary decisions against specific accounts. There is EOS for that kind of shit.

It was a decision to guard the integrity of the chain and the project, in the face of numerous instances where the perpetrators of the 22.5 hack had disclosed plans to dissolve steem.

It just pissed off a billionaire from my perspective.

Let that sink in.

Let that sink in.

Let what sink in, exactly?

That it's now possible to successfully go against people with a lot of money and have them beg for mercy instead of having the unlimited power they used to have.

We are in the position not just to have a fighting chance, but to be a significant force where historically this would have been "solved" with money before anyone would even know. The man with the money is not in need of empathy. This is justice in its purest, and we should deal with it apropriately. Not bending over as a community.

O I see, so they should have went along with his plans to dissolve steem, because billionaires?

Heck, no. My point; which seems to have been missed; is that v. 22.2 achieved nothing, nothing and more nothing EXCEPT to piss off a billionaire.