Simply disagreeing does not appear to fall under criteria for flagging presented in the pop up screen when flagging is chosen.
Disagreement on rewards
Fraud or plagiarism
Hate speech or internet trolling
Intentional mis-catorgarized content or Spam
Where does a boy-o like him get his stake, anyway?
He himself said on another thread that disagreeing is not grounds for downvoting.
He has received delegations, though I don't know where from.
A real concern for me is the @freedom account which seems to be a Witness Maker. It is not that @freedom and myself disagree all that much as to good top 20 witness choices. My concern is that a witness who has @freedom's support told me it is a secondary account of @ned. In and of itself that is not outragious as @ned has a legitimate stake; yet judging from the actual @ned account you would be led to believe he is staying neutral for conflict of reason reasons; which in my opinion he and all of STINC should be doing.
If anyone can share any proof definitively linking @ned to the @freedom account, it would be appreciated if you could share it.
I am pretty sure there is meant to be an official policy that Steemit Inc. has no say in the witness selection. I don't have any evidence that freedom is ned - someone else who is a witness claims he has proof it is actually dan ;)
Well that would put a whole different spin on things. 😎