Creating a distributed, self-governing, mob that works reliably to allocate resources for the betterment of the whole rather than the individual is challenging.
I don't want to get too philosophical, but the problem is a good leader. You can't replace a good leader with ten bad. It won't work. You can't replace a good doctor ten bad. It is not equivalent replacement.
I would have thought about the criteria of a good leader. It would be right, in my opinion, to develop a system of symptoms, which can give a numerical assessment of the quality of leadership of the person.
And it would be right to think about the system of education which can make good leaders.
You have to make one good doctor. Ten bad doctors do not help. How to separate the bad from the good doctor. Here is what is in my opinion a significant issue.
What good is democracy if the people choose bad leaders. If people are not able to distinguish good leaders from bad. If you don't think about it, all the problems of the existing social system will appear here.