Thanks for the information, I was wondering the same thing about minds.com not censorship idea. Since it is not on a blockchain base system (just open source), it CAN be censored, for now. it is a good idea as you say, but since steemit already exists in a BC based system i dont really see the point at this time, in the future if they structure the site in a way for the users to have access at the promises they claim it would make a little more sense, i hope they go that way. I also think it would be great for steemit to add a function like bitchute.com has , a torrent way of sharing the data and no centralized servers needed, we the users will have the power of the contents and a secure way for them to survive ,add that with the blockchain technology and i see a win win situation! thanks fot the post!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I hope you don't mind , I used this post as an example on some pro minds.com posts in youtube, to show that minds it's not really what they are claiming to be (not having a blockchain tech or something similar to back their not censorship claims) if there is a problem about the usage of this post , let me know and I will erase the comments i made in said posts, thanks again.
No problem, thank you.