Weekly Steem Stats Report - Monday, August 26, 2019

[penguinpablo]

Welcome to my Steem Stats Report for Monday, August 26, 2019. All data comes directly from the Steem blockchain and is based on UTC time.

The format of the date fields is 'YYYY-WW'.
I.e. 2018-23 is week 23 of 2018 (from Monday, June 4 to Sunday, June 10).

1. Weekly number of Posts (including comments)

Date	Posts
2019-33	268,110
2019-32	262,453
2019-31	272,486
2019-30	277,719
2019-29	290,765
2019-28	275,635
2019-27	337,024
2019-26	372,941

2. Weekly number of votes

Date	Votes	Paid bot votes	Percent bot votes
2019-33	3,442,163	10,923	0.32%
2019-32	3,573,927	11,858	0.33%
2019-31	3,484,713	12,411	0.36%
2019-30	3,570,410	13,251	0.37%
2019-29	3,549,979	14,179	0.4%
2019-28	3,613,142	14,315	0.4%
2019-27	3,733,713	14,776	0.4%
2019-26	3,850,579	15,566	0.4%

3. Daily accounts transacting (daily average per week)

_{A 'transacting account' is a Steem account that made at least one transaction on the Steem blockchain. This can be a vote, post, comment, transfer, power up or sbd conversion. Users who only read from the Steem blockchain without interacting are not included. The actual number of 'Active users' is therefore much higher than the accounts transacting.}

Date	Accounts transacting
2019-33	38,811
2019-32	41,221
2019-31	40,737
2019-30	41,261
2019-29	38,733
2019-28	40,849
2019-27	41,938
2019-26	43,202

4. Posts + Comments per post

Date	Average # comments	Posts
2019-33	2.69	72,722
2019-32	2.62	72,462
2019-31	2.75	72,603
2019-30	2.74	74,219
2019-29	2.91	74,322
2019-28	2.67	75,183
2019-27	3.30	78,437
2019-26	3.79	77,853

5. New accounts created

Date	New Accounts
2019-33	3,220
2019-32	2,516
2019-31	2,650
2019-30	3,302
2019-29	4,311
2019-28	3,697
2019-27	1,115
2019-26	1,423

Who created the new accounts last week

Account	Accounts created
@steem	2,445
@steemhunt	142
@steemmonsters	114
@blocktrades	83
@fundition	82
@oracle-d	44
@partiko	41
@steemwallet.born	21
@dlike	20
@trips.teem	16

6. Weekly Amount of SBD converted to Steem

Date	Amount in SBD
2019-33	72,450 SBD
2019-32	112,652 SBD
2019-31	147,313 SBD
2019-30	171,821 SBD
2019-29	194,535 SBD
2019-28	246,373 SBD
2019-27	407,712 SBD
2019-26	129,580 SBD

7. Weekly Amount of Steem Powered UP & DOWN

Date	Powered UP	Powered DOWN	Difference
2019-33	1,570,253 STEEM	1,206,380 STEEM	363,873 STEEM
2019-32	1,001,408 STEEM	1,298,640 STEEM	-297,232 STEEM
2019-31	1,214,352 STEEM	1,290,437 STEEM	-76,085 STEEM
2019-30	1,442,709 STEEM	1,310,063 STEEM	132,646 STEEM
2019-29	908,777 STEEM	1,325,441 STEEM	-416,664 STEEM
2019-28	1,299,640 STEEM	1,305,115 STEEM	-5,475 STEEM
2019-27	559,380 STEEM	1,451,784 STEEM	-892,404 STEEM
2019-26	562,858 STEEM	1,428,809 STEEM	-865,951 STEEM
Average p/d	1,279,678 STEEM	1,526,577 STEEM	-246,900 STEEM

Largest 'Power ups' last week

Date & Time	From	To	STEEM
Aug 22, 21:36	@sct.wallet	@sct.wallet	495,000.000
Aug 25, 03:29	@talkative-bk	@talkative-bk	137,333.148
Aug 24, 09:19	@pnp	@matt-a	126,254.635
Aug 21, 22:37	@powerguy	@powerguy	90,297.690
Aug 19, 05:33	@sigizzang	@sigizzang	80,616.412
Aug 22, 14:54	@fredrikaa	@fredrikaa	29,000.000
Aug 22, 12:41	@sct.wallet	@sct.wallet	20,000.001
Aug 23, 14:58	@liondani	@liondani	20,000.000
Aug 19, 16:51	@double-u	@double-u	15,170.519
Aug 22, 23:44	@evronm	@evronm	15,155.673

8. Weekly Steem Transfers from and to exchanges

_{Transfers from one exchange to another are excluded.}

Date	Transfers to exchanges	Withdrawals from exchanges	Difference
201934	1,290,865 STEEM	1,081,339 STEEM	209,526 STEEM
201933	1,581,528 STEEM	985,193 STEEM	596,334 STEEM
201932	1,904,703 STEEM	1,261,752 STEEM	642,951 STEEM
201931	1,692,006 STEEM	1,426,548 STEEM	265,458 STEEM
201930	1,850,278 STEEM	1,010,113 STEEM	840,165 STEEM
201929	1,596,557 STEEM	1,303,615 STEEM	292,941 STEEM
201928	1,635,602 STEEM	848,967 STEEM	786,636 STEEM
201927	1,337,379 STEEM	575,218 STEEM	762,161 STEEM

Deposits and withdrawals by exchange last week

Exchange	Deposits	Withdrawals	Difference
Binance	1,847,457 STEEM	1,499,498 STEEM	347,959 STEEM
Bithumb	5 STEEM	16 STEEM	-11 STEEM
Bittrex	535,001 STEEM	445,677 STEEM	89,324 STEEM
Poloniex	71,372 STEEM	45,847 STEEM	25,526 STEEM
Gopax	14,305 STEEM	10,703 STEEM	3,602 STEEM
Huobi	493,863 STEEM	404,894 STEEM	88,970 STEEM
Openledger	0 STEEM	0 STEEM	0 STEEM
Upbit	1,035,874 STEEM	1,381,718 STEEM	-345,844 STEEM

Largest transfers last week

Date & Time	From	To	Amount
Aug 22, 20:03	@steem-peg	@sct.wallet	495,000.000 STEEM
Aug 25, 17:15	@binance-hot	@binance8	461,569.459 STEEM
Aug 24, 17:43	@upbitsteemhot	@talkative-bk	137,330.997 STEEM
Aug 25, 17:10	@deepcrypto8	@binance-hot	104,764.483 STEEM
Aug 22, 10:58	@binance-hot	@littlehope	104,267.666 STEEM
Aug 21, 22:33	@upbitsteemhot	@powerguy	90,000.000 STEEM
Aug 20, 02:03	@binance-hot	@pnp	84,372.345 STEEM
Aug 20, 09:10	@deepcrypto8	@binance-hot	80,986.298 STEEM
Aug 20, 09:01	@therising	@deepcrypto8	80,000.000 STEEM
Aug 25, 14:50	@deepcrypto8	@binance-hot	67,621.549 STEEM

9. Weekly STEEM transfers

Date	STEEM transferred
201934	12,954,459 STEEM
201933	10,677,634 STEEM
201932	15,122,660 STEEM
201931	10,905,907 STEEM
201930	12,461,902 STEEM
201929	13,097,885 STEEM
201928	13,588,652 STEEM
201927	12,338,496 STEEM

10. Steem Price Update

---

_{¯\___(ツ)____/¯ Follow me @penguinpablo for daily Steem statistics.}

Comments

[arthur.grafo]

Pablo, I actually came here to let you know your SteemNow site is not working. It shows ZERO for everything. I doubt Steem is quite that bad yet, so maybe a glitch?

[penguinpablo]

Thank you for reaching out to me.
It was a problem with loading the Steem.JS file from a CDN which is down since last sunday. I switched to a new CDN and everything is working properly now.

You might have to clear your browser cache if it still doesn't work on your side.

[krischik]

Postings on the decline, More power down then up, more transfer to exchanges then back and a HF which will make it worse again (just like the last one).

And for those who argue that the HF is for Investors™ i like to point out that without an active user base creating interesting posting your investment goes down the drain:

Perviously I power up to make use of such a low prices but the last HF didn't do anything for small and new users and the next one seems ever worse.

We need more payout for postings below 20 STEEM not for postings with more.

[arthur.grafo]

The reply to you:

I will tell people you can still earn more of Steem than you are likely to get elsewhere.

It is not true, in the sense that any creator of a post who has an SP of under...what? $2,000, is not likely to make any money. Making money, the term, is relative. Not even the members who are very poor are going to bother if all they can earn is a few steem cents, with a total of one US ollar per week or per month. That is not earning money, just the cost of web connection becomes an expense that reduces what we earn to negative figures. For the majority, if we are to pay, then we might as well do something fun and play a game or watch a movie...elsewhere.

Do not forget that if by accident you DO earn some money, with the big boys deciding to finance Flagging, you'll soon be saying bye-bye to your tiny income stream. You do not have to do anything wrong, as they can and do flag just because they feel like it.

All those 'socialists' who are depending on our good (or submissive) natures are dreaming. We are not as stupid as they seem to think we are; many have awoken. Only the very poor and desperate are still unaware. Be interesting to see how much money they make from them, since their SP, in many cases, is so low they cannot post more often than once a week.

By the way, we are not earning 50% of what others awarded us, we are only getting the 43% - and as we are told, if your earnings are under 20STEEM, you are further reduced and only backed if you can earn over 20STEEM.

Who earns over? The dolphins and whales - in other words, the minority.

I have therefore unticked most of my witnesses - since the top 20 showed us they voted for what earns THEM more, not for us. Unticking does not help if it is just me...plus, we need to vote for witnesses who are not in the top 30 or so. Get them up into the top 20 and that becomes a game changer - otherwise, there is nothing we can do. Just walk away, or Decline Payout on our posts so that that fat cats cannot curate and earn from us.

[arcange]

WARNING - The message you received from @krischik is a CONFIRMED SCAM!
DO NOT FOLLOW any instruction and DO NOT CLICK on any link in the comment!

For more information about this scam, read this post:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@arcange/phishing-reported-post-copied-without-your-permission

If you find my work to protect you and the community valuable, please consider to upvote this warning or to vote for my witness.

[steevc]

There is a bit of a decline in users recently and the potential for lower posting rewards will not help. You need a lot of SP to really benefit from the curation rewards. But I will tell people you can still earn more of Steem than you are likely to get elsewhere. What we need is more real curation of good content rather than self-interest. We need to think about what future Steem has.

It will be interesting to see what difference HF21 makes to the graphs in the next week or two.

[pixresteemer]

Congratz, your post has been resteemed and, who knows, will maybe appear in the next edition of the #dailyspotlights (Click on my face if you want to know more about me...)Check the rules of the Daily Spotlights if you want to nominate someone!Pixresteemer is also listed as promoter on The Steemians Directory

[steemitboard]

Congratulations @penguinpablo! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You distributed more than 61000 upvotes. Your next target is to reach 62000 upvotes.

_{You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!