Yes. We call that "Whataboutism". Nothing is denied, just the "questioning of motives". Sort of a back-handed ad-hominem "argument". The article is factually correct, no matter what the "motive".
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes. We call that "Whataboutism". Nothing is denied, just the "questioning of motives". Sort of a back-handed ad-hominem "argument". The article is factually correct, no matter what the "motive".
LOL. There was plenty of things that he said that weren't "factually correct", as I recall. I honestly can't be bothered to go back and read through it, however.
My key point was pretty simple and apparently you don't dispute it: the poster of most of your 'facts' was quite open later that all the while he was discouraging others from mining the coin, he was mining the crap out of it himself, and that he was spreading the FUD to lessen the mining competition. To neglect to mention this in your post was a blatant failure in reporting.