Black and White vs Shades of Grey. The hidden cost of simple answers. The challenge of the Steemit environment.

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

A simple question. Does simplicity serve us, or can it be dangerous thing?

We are drawn to black and white answers to complex questions, but we all know that life is shades of grey.

Our brains are wired to look at our environment for things that are novel and unexpected. There is a phrase where 'something catches our eye' that embodies this well. Some 'thing' we don't know what, has taken possession of our attention. Prior to that moment what we had been looking at was being interpreted by our brain as safe things that we understand. It didn't require much energy. It didn't require all of our attention.

When something novel comes along that we don't understand, our brain goes into hyperdrive. Is it dangerous? Should I run from it? Can I eat it? Is it friend or foe? Novelty is complexity. Novelty is discovering something about our environment that we have never seen before. We then process what we know about it, to see if we can put it into the comforting category of things we have seen before. Then we can go back to consuming less energy in a predictable and well known environment.

People love simplicity. Simple answers to simple questions. Black and white. Good and evil. We are drawn to simplicity because it free us from the burden of complexity. With a simple answer, we can use broad strokes to answer the questions of life and then move past uncertainty. There are problems with simple answers. They are often not always an accurate reflection of reality. We can sometimes make simple assumptions that lead us to disastrous consequences. In a novel environment, simple answers are not the solution.

On the flip side of simplicity, we have complexity. The discovery of something novel that defies our previous abstractions of reality. It excites our nervous systems and may cause us to experience some anxiety and fear. We can't exist in this state forever, because it can wear us out. It's purpose is to get us to take notice. It wants us to open our eyes and examine something closely. We are motivated to watch its movement and perceive it's detail, so that we can create rules of thumb and generalizations about its behavior. We are integrating complexity into our understanding and giving it new meaning.

This dynamic is playing out now on Steemit. We have the urge to accept simple answers that give us comfort and security. Should we be comfortable? I don't think comfort is the right feeling when confronting novelty and the unknown. We should be watchful and attentive. We should be analyzing what is dominating our attention to better understand what it is we are perceiving. Is it friend or foe? Can we eat it? Can we make it our pet? Interesting questions! Don't take your eyes of the beast for long. It might have teeth!

I'm motivated to write about this because I would like to encourage people to enter into the continuing dialogue of Steemit and it's evolution without the baggage of simple answers or black and white notions of what is true or false. This is a whole new animal, quite novel and not the least understood yet. It begs us to pay attention. It's not a safe thing. Not now, while we don't understand it. We are in a grey area. It requires a lot of energy and will demand our full attention if we are to correctly form an abstraction of what it means.

Sort:  

Hello @seablue,

It gives us pleasure to inform you that you have been chosen as a featured author by the @robinhoodwhale initiative.

Learn more about the Robinhood Whale here!

If you wish to support this initiative, join the Robinhood Whale voting trail on Streemian. Every vote counts!

We hope to see you continuing to post some great stuff on Steemit!

Good luck!
~RHW~

Thank you!

Comfort is a foe of creativity...it stifles it. Some people run from perceived danger, some to it. I took a course in college on analyzing science fiction and one of the elements to look for is displacement. I think the sense of displacement is what draws many of us to science fiction. The same can be said of novelty and complexity, I think. Great article...nice to see someone with a unique way of approaching things. Upvoted and resteemed! Love Bosch, by the way!!!

Thanks for adding your perspective, @richq11 . Your comment makes me think of musicians who seem so very productive in the turmoil and rebellion of youth, composing vital and relevant sounds, but who's energy fades over time as they begin to live more comfortable lives.

Bosch is fantastic for complexity. :-D

Good point! One thing I love about Bosch's painting is that he brings complexity to a very simple concept...Good vs Evil.

I think Steemit is an experiment, linking all our minds together to form one creative personality ....hehe except we must behave or our popularity number will decline, which inhibits creativity so does the money incentive because one starts acting like Skinners pigeons. There really is no set form of earning my Steem here, people start doing all sorts of interesting dances thinking this is the formula for high earnings, just like Skinners pigeons.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/bf-skinner-the-man-who-taught-pigeons-to-play-ping-pong-and-rats-to-pull-levers-5363946/

I don't trust anyone, including me...my motivation is mostly conditioned responses and I like to watch how this site triggers my deep programming (conditioning).

I'm intrigued by the pidgeons now.

I had to study Skinner and other founders of psychology for my nursing degree, which I never graduated because I hurt my back. I learned a lot about allopathic medicine and psychology. They are not for healing but for control and management of symptoms/people. I'm kinda glad I didn't become a nurse!

Well, I am into technology. So I think life is white or black and, being honest, I'd never trusted this "white".

Yes. White is hiding it true colors. :-)

This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Dec 16. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $4.61 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Dec 16 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.