your concept is interesting until I hit the part where you think every user should be forced into voting on the matter or risk losing access. Forced voting will just piss people off enough to support the bad behaviour. That is rather counterproductive.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Bad behaviour by some people force decisions to be made and sides to be picked at times. At least this is democratic and the reason it is forced, is because you have to have accountability on both sides here -- the community users and the core dev's.
The dev's have to protect and limit their liability so if everyone gets the same chances and time frames and warnings, it is completely level on the playing field.
Like with real estate, there is no perfect house, or ideals.
It also reinforces to EVERYONE -- bad behaviour will not be tolerated, and community solutions will be found.
Like I said Barry.. you force those who are not engaged in bad behaviour to take sides, then you will encounter those angry enough at the forced involvement to take a FU attitude and vote in favour of the transgressor. There is nothing democratic about being forced to take part.
Ask me to take part in a vote on the behaviour, I'll do so and uphold the community standards. Tell me I have to and I will take a screw you approach and vote contrary.
LOL.
Anyone who would act like that on a vote.....honestly, is an idiot.
anyone who would force someone to vote under pain of being turfed if you don't is likewise an idiot