Some great points here, thanks. Have defined a voting ring now in my article. I can see how this could have been handled better now. Some false positives were inevitable but there has likely been a lot more than that in this first trial. apologies for any offence. Absolutely not intended :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not offended, I just think you're a little hasty in going down this not so well defined rabbit hole. :P Nevertheless, scour the blockchain and see what you find. I'm sure it won't be the first or last time. :) Best of luck.
Agreed. Not claiming to be an expert here but thought the community would be interested in the first trial. It could have been done better, agreed. :)
But it looks like I was onto something. So I have learned that these exist https://steemit.com/votingtrail/@acidyo/curation-trails-bad-or-good-for-the-platform
Surprised there is not more amazement that these are allowed. :0
Yeah, if you keep digging you will find seemingly endless discussion about many of these novel responses to the game that is the Steem blockchain, here on Steemit. We've got bots, trails, reward curves... It goes on and on.
Again.. 'allowed' is a funny concept here. It's a complex stake based system. It would be dead tomorrow if someone could just go around telling everybody what they could and couldn't do with their stake. The rules are in the code, after all. They are able to be modified with enough consensus, but the system favors free and unhindered use.
thanks for your level-headedness. I will take all this feedback on board and my next post will be done better!