But, of course, it isn't "whale collusion" when the same whales repeatedly vote for your posts, right?
Or are you going to suggest that you got that 74 rep from minnow votes?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
But, of course, it isn't "whale collusion" when the same whales repeatedly vote for your posts, right?
Or are you going to suggest that you got that 74 rep from minnow votes?
I work to put out content that people HONESTLY evaluate. Not constantly upvoted for my content regardless of what is there (some people do, and that's a max payout of $5-6 on autovoters alone). You know you're lying when you said what you just said. You're just trying to spread lies and see how many fools buy into it.
You're such a deceiver. Get a clue, but you can't it seems. You willfully refuse to look at things honestly and see the difference. It's just idiocy of thinking someone get's voted on, not for quality content that is evaluated, no, just assume it has nothing to do with content that people actually value since it is HQ content... no, keep denying reality, be a fool, and say that someone only gets upvoted because whales are colluded to upvote their HQ or interesting material that isn't repetitive crap charts.
But you go ahead and vote on the same shit charts each day, with all your buddies to pump crap to the top, with higher rewards than most people, but hey don't flag that crap because you're making curation rewards from it, flag the guy who puts out HQ work that can change the world, and for the first time gets his HQ work on the top 7 trending and a payout over 100$ for the HQ work. Yeah, that's worthless junk, better flag that. You're a hypocrite, a liar, a deceiver, and it's a joke that people don't see through your bs.
It's wrong we see only black and white.... It is wrong to put labels on people like bad and good.... We have all or good and bad moments... I like to see the glass half full... I like to focus on the good things both have brought to the community.... Are you aware for example that one of hundreds of @smooth contributions is about $17K for busy project(I will not mention other initiatives since it is easy for an above average IQ person to make a basic investigation and find out)
PS note that I am too in general against "flagging"
If you are going to make false accusations and talk about "spreading lies" while doing exactly that, and generally respond disrespectfully to contrary opinions, that only gives me another reason to conclude that your content (along with your behavior), is not a valuable contribution, but I already largely believe that so it isn't a large leap.