A few days back I did read an article by someone, it made me so mad I thought about flagging it, but I decided against it since the post was not plagiarism. Later on I realized that the way the author wrote the post made me angry, and I do not think it was there intent to make others angry. So like you said I simply did not vote on the post, later I found another post by the same author and they are a very interesting person. So I think your right, don't simply flag a post because you disagree, others my like the post. What I find to be good quility post I have also seen change from day to day based on if I'm in the mood to read a long post like yours, or simply in the mood for something a bit shorter. So your right, there is no way to say something like this post adds value or it does not, because it would truly be up to the individual reading the post. Hence I have decided, I will let @cheetah flag the post, if it has been flagged I generally will not vote on it, otherwise if it is something I enjoyed I will vote, if I do not like the article I will simply save my vote for an article I do appreciate.
Thank you for the detailed opinion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: