Im not suggesting that at all - im just saying that there will be alternative systems which solve problems of unequal distribution of voting power in the future systems.
In the example I give, maybe a casual viewer would get a vote worth 1%, while someone who has contributed 100 posts would get a vote worth 10%.
Ok I see your point.
I was thinking that 80% of "reward pool" should be shared by the "audience"
the "actor" gets only 20%, but earns from volume.
and either voting bots are banned &/ or only 1 account / person.
At the moment is it the same as MSM where a few at the top own & control the flow of info & $$. Steem could be different, and give 'power' to the base / mass. But that means a look at the problems. (whales/bots / PC enforcers etc)