"What positive changes do you want to see?
Lets talk about that and find ways of getting closer to making that happen."
Fair enough! Here are 6 for starters...
Change the member "reputation" system so that no member can downvote other members, or hide their posts. This could be accomplished in one of two ways: i) Allow only upvotes for posts, comments or replies; or ii) If we allow both upvotes and downvotes, eliminate the reputation system completely.
Set a specific amount for each upvote, regardless of how much steem power the voting member, or the author has.
Require all members to have so much steem power for each upvote they wish to cast in a given day. i.e. No steem power = no votes.
If we allow downvotes, restrict all members to perhaps just 1 or 2 downvotes per day. This would prevent most retaliation by those members who get their kicks out of downvoting dozens if not hundreds of posts from a single author they decide they do not like for some reason.
Change the curator reward pool so that it is equally divided among "all" upvotes for posts, comments and replies. We could even set a time limit for votes to be counted, perhaps the first 12 hours of a post?
Change the current 13 week power down time frame to something much less, perhaps 4 weeks as a current proposal suggests.
..
If you could contribute something positive toward moving the platform toward a democratic process for choosing our top twenty witnesses, that would be enough.
What would you need to change about the management of your account to achieve that I wonder
Please read the whitepaper before speaking again.