Great! Really looking forward to this one. Most people thought BCH would go down, but they were proven wrong.
I never really researched/listened to Roger a lot but he really has to come clean with what happened in this interview.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Take a look for yourself with the full context:
Effing Roger! The $36 vote on your comment shows that you are really sorry how you handled the situation. ;P Not sure if you are aware about it but in the pronouns debate the argument "If you say someone you dont want to be called X, they should not call you X" is the losing side.
Anyways, I think there is a lot of shady shit going on in Crypto and you being a little emotional is not really a good reason to not hold BCH, but that is exactly what many in the BTC community did and still do.
I for one will only be buying Litecoin as a BTC alternative.. Forget Bcash.
Roger ought to take some cues from Charlie Lee. Charlie is what an honest spokesman for a coin should look like. Extremely intelligent, humble, calm.. basically everything that Roger shows himself not to be.
Thank you master
Welp as I said I never looked too deep into all the drama and I was aware that the video I linked is strongly edited to portrait a certain picture of you.
I actually wrote a post a month ago that is quite positive on BCH https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@thatgermandude/why-i-am-sceptical-towards-btc-classic-and-hodl-my-bch
I don't think you should judge a product by the character of the people promoting it and while I do think that having a thick skin is important, I understand that for you Bitcoin Cash is just not some random internet debate, so maybe it is unfair to demand for you to stay emotionless about it.
Looking forward to the second interview with Pakman where you discuss more about politics, I would love to jump into that discussion in the comments.
Maybe someone should tip off Rodger about Teal Swan..
that interview was an instant classic
This man seems like a nice, reasonable dude. Has a great sense of perspective.
Totally not a selfish charlitain. Nope. /s
There is ZERO excuse for how he acted in this interview. That was the most incredibly arrogant display I think I've ever seen. That's not even mentioning his arrogance towards Andreas for not having enough money in BTC.
Honestly, I would ask him how he can ever think it's appropriate to judge and criticize people based upon their wealth? I'd like to hear him explain that..
Also ask him if he'll donate an equivalent amount of BCH to Andreas as others have done with BTC since.
Seriously. Roger and I don't agree on everything, but did you even notice what got him so triggered? It took a great deal to push him over that edge. Good job of the "interviewer" trolling him both before, during and after the "interview"/"debate".
No he shouldn't have done it. But the arrogance on the other side was no less.
All I can say is that Roger gave us a very clear glimpse into his deeper character. Enough that I never want anything to do with Roger or Bcash.
He has a temper, sure. Maybe legit anger issues even. I've seen much worse though and again don't forget about the interviewer, that guy obviously is not a good guy. Same goes for someone like Richard Heart etc etc.
For all the shit that people give Roger, he has taken a lot of it especially these last few years without any outburst what so ever. Still, I'm not here to always defend him, but lets be fair to all participants in the debate. Give shit based on merit if their is shit to be handed out.