You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem on Forbes! The Momentum Continues

in #steemit8 years ago

I respect the fact that you're telling me the reason why.

One thing I should explain (for value purposes) is that the proceeds of most my posts go to the marketing operation we are launching very soon, I shared one of the strategies we will use with you, and if you want I can show you a lot of details about what's in the works.

And we will probably launch next week.

And this is not a new thing, when I was part of Curie, although my posts were rewarded, none of the rewards I kept, all of them went to pay the staff, so there too although my posts seemed on the surface over-rewarded, if I'm putting my sweat, thinking long term for the benefit of all, and giving away my rewards for the purpose... In that case, I don't know how much over-rewarded I was since none of it went to my pocket.

But I understand if someone was upset.

Notice how in the time frames between the outreach and Curie how infrequent were my posts in regards to when funds are needed.

You're one of the most open whales in the chat, that's true, and if you want I can show you the work that has been done underground or anything you need to know, that's all I can say.

Anyways, thank you for the explanation.

Sort:  

From all I've seen you are great contributor to Steem and I support your efforts 100%. There was nothing personally directed at you here, just an adjustment I felt was appropriate for this particular post. The reward reduction goes to all the other voted posts and comments, as I'm sure you are aware, so we can view it as a form of balance more than anything else. I am happy to discuss your outreach and marketing efforts any time!

Thank you and you know I feel the same about you. I know it's not personal, no bad feelings of any sorts.

I'll send you a message then and let you know more then.