You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Witness Questionnaire - A Solution for Voter Confusion?

in #steemit8 years ago

Thanks. Looks like @smooth and @joseph heard your call - thanks to them and everyone else who voted for this because I agree it is an important issue even if it isn't very exciting:)

The witness issue is poorly understood. I was speaking with a few people on the #witness channel last night and @someguy123 is currently working on a post to cover the witness topic in a brief and easy to understand way for non-technical people. Hopefully that will help.

I wonder if there could be some sort of reward for selecting witnesses early (similar to curation). I don't think enough people are knowledgeable about the topic yet, but many thanks for your clarification.

That's a good idea. I'm not sure how feasible that would be but would be worth looking at. I'm not sure what the "turnout" is in terms of people voting for witnesses - I suspect the number of people voting is tiny compared to the number of accounts. This might help.

Sort:  

There are many who have no idea that they can vote for witnesses at all, so I would expect a very small number actually do vote.

I am also not sure about the feasibility witness voting curation, but to reward voters for voting and voting in a way that the majority deem to be good seems to be something that would be wise.

Glad this post received some love!

Yes you are probably right. Thanks.