And the "offender" madalchemist posted a comment 10 days ago.
Waytruthlight quit posting two years ago because they were getting unfairly downvoted. Now they just downvote other people out of spite.
This is an awesome model.
Downvote people so they stop posting and just stay mad for two years downvoting random accounts so they get mad and stop posting and just stay mad for two years downvoting random accounts so they get mad and stop posting...
This BOOSTS THE REWARD POOL which gets scooped into the hands of the TOP EARNERS.
Asking what is a crime? Something no one has seen, that someone claims on the Internet without proof? Steemian's like to claim all sorts of things, 99.8% of it is bullshit.
I have no freaking clue, if it is true, then yes of course it is a crime, even a 4 year old is smart enough to know that.
I mean, if someone called you the N-word, basically name-calling, what action or time-out period (30 days of silence) do you believe would be a reasonable censure?
I agree you've clearly been wronged, but you obviously outweigh @starworld significantly, so it's not exactly a "fair fight".
I'm not even sure if they're willing to apologize or take down (or modify) the offending comment. Maybe they could settle for just calling you a "jerk" or add, IMHO right before the statement?
I realize I have no option but to appeal to your intelligence and reasonableness.
I'm not even trying to help @starworld, I'm doing it for the newbz.
Sure, ok, so does that mean that if someone crosses some unspecified line-in-the-sand, that they're just SOL forever?
Don't you think if the situation was reversed that you'd appreciate some kind of warning like a take-down-notice or some quantifiable written rule or at least some option to "pay" for what they've done?
I have trouble believing you think "might makes right".
Would you consider this a "crime" as well?
https://steemit.com/writing/@madalchemist/q3ff7r
Or do you only downvote accounts that mention you personally?
His last post and comment was 2 years ago.
Do some due diligence ok?
I'm asking if you consider it a "crime"?
And the "offender" madalchemist posted a comment 10 days ago.
Waytruthlight quit posting two years ago because they were getting unfairly downvoted. Now they just downvote other people out of spite.
This is an awesome model.
Downvote people so they stop posting and just stay mad for two years downvoting random accounts so they get mad and stop posting and just stay mad for two years downvoting random accounts so they get mad and stop posting...
This BOOSTS THE REWARD POOL which gets scooped into the hands of the TOP EARNERS.
It's a WIN-WIN!!!!
Asking what is a crime? Something no one has seen, that someone claims on the Internet without proof? Steemian's like to claim all sorts of things, 99.8% of it is bullshit.
I have no freaking clue, if it is true, then yes of course it is a crime, even a 4 year old is smart enough to know that.
Oh, ok. I thought you were downvoting @starworld because they called you a name ("suggested you and buildawale were a ped0").
From my perspective that's just, "Something no one has seen, that someone claims on the Internet without proof?"
I'm just wondering if you downvote accounts for name-calling generally, or do you only downvote when someone's calling you (or your alts) names?
You can look at my downvote history and figure it out for yourself. Get some education.
I can't seem to find the tab that shows your motives.
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
Isn't name-calling considered an ad hominem attack?
Nevermind, ok, let's call it libel for the sake of argument.
What can @starworld do to slake your wroth?
I mean, if someone called you the N-word, basically name-calling, what action or time-out period (30 days of silence) do you believe would be a reasonable censure?
I agree you've clearly been wronged, but you obviously outweigh @starworld significantly, so it's not exactly a "fair fight".
I'm not even sure if they're willing to apologize or take down (or modify) the offending comment. Maybe they could settle for just calling you a "jerk" or add, IMHO right before the statement?
I realize I have no option but to appeal to your intelligence and reasonableness.
I'm not even trying to help @starworld, I'm doing it for the newbz.
freedom of speech, not freedom of consequences.
Sure, ok, so does that mean that if someone crosses some unspecified line-in-the-sand, that they're just SOL forever?
Don't you think if the situation was reversed that you'd appreciate some kind of warning like a take-down-notice or some quantifiable written rule or at least some option to "pay" for what they've done?
I have trouble believing you think "might makes right".
Thanks again for your time and consideration.
I don't go around calling people scammers and pedophiles.
Of course not.
But have you ever accidentally pissed someone off?
Crossed some line you didn't even know was there?
I know I have.