Hey @abh12345,
first of - I didn't upvote myself for the rewards but to make a statement since you mentioned smartsteem in your post and I believe that the response is important enough that it shouldn't be buried under all the other ones.
Now - I also don't take it as an attack, it's just that you made clear that you're not a fan of delegating for profit. Which I can understand - but I don't believe that his is any significant risk to STEEM as plattform for content.
The far bigger risk are big stackholders who are upvoting each other in circles.
Upvote-Services on the other hand, give everyone the chance to also get visibility.
Also - smartsteem.com is NOT just another bid-bot, but a whole plattform with the goal of empowering quality content.
I understand it was not for profit.
Sadly this cannot be stopped, its 'proof of stake' here and we cannot help with this.
You need money for bid-bots, not everyone has this. And so it is the case that good posts (30-60$), are not as high up in the hot/trending as the ones voted by the creator, that do not not match this quality.
I would still like your views on what you think Steemit would look like if everyone chose to delegate to a bid-bot.
Personally, I think it would be a case of the richest person wins, and hope that's not what you wish for this platform.