I agree, but this requires a different method than giving an alternative way to promote. In my opinion, this requires incentivized downvotes and higher curation rewards.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I agree, but this requires a different method than giving an alternative way to promote. In my opinion, this requires incentivized downvotes and higher curation rewards.
If it requires a very delicate teamwork and the hypotheses that are generated, update each day more.
It is necessary to make a system that a company sees the effective marketing to promote its product or its application in the blockchain and would be willing to pay 5000$ in the future to advertise in steemit by divesos methods that exist in digital marketing.
Thanks friend for your good comment
I don't think down votes really work in this environment. Largely because the down voting places the voter in a unique group of people voicing opposition and they view it as a waste of a vote.
Something that is commonly seen in society, is a situation where one person cries for help, but no one helps. But when one person decides to help, everyone does.
Down voting is the exact same thing. Very few people deliberately down vote because it doesn't seem advantageous to the person doing the down voting, so naturally, why do it?
The real way to remove bid bots is to increase their costs.
In a natural environment, bid bots would never exists because there there would be some form of arbitrage to expose their weaknesses.
In the case of steem, the arbitrage doesn't exists because a portion of bidbots services are subsidized by steem Inc's nodes. If that cost gets tacked on, surely the roi on bidbots would decrease substantially. Then capitalism occurs and the true cost of bid bots are revealed.